| |
Ytfs Elon Musk is being allowed to lsquo;make the rules rsquo; in space warns ESA
Friday 24 March 2023 7:30 am|Updated:Thursday 31 August 2023 3:10 pmVisas for people fleeing disasters caused by climate change, suggests think tankBy: City AM reporterShareFacebookShare on FacebookXShare on TwitterLinkedInShare on LinkedInWhatsAppShare on WhatsAppEmailShare on stanley cup becher EmailThe UK should provide visas for people fleeing natural disasters caused by climate change, a think tank has said.Centre-right think tank Onward urged the government to provide safe, legal routes for climate refugees to reach the UK to reduce the impact of related migration on border security.Hundreds of millions of people are expected to be displaced by the effects of climate change over the next 30 years, with some likely to seek refuge in the UK, including by illegal routes.In its report, Forced to Move, Onward proposed introducing a natural disaster visa scheme to allow people to either earn money to help rebuild their lives before returning home or settle permanently if they have no home to return to after an environm owala deutschland ental disaster.The think tank also proposed a scheme for people in vulnerable countries to be trained in sustainability skills and then either stay to help their country adapt to climate change or move to the UK for a limited period to work on the net-zero transition.The reportrsquo authors said: A robust immigration system and an enforced border to lower the level of illegal migration into th polene france e country is key to maintaining public confidence.However, new controlla Slwl Laurence King, founder of the eponymous publisher, talks adult colouring books, soviets, Ezra Pound and anti-digital
Wednesday 22 August 2018 1:56 pm|Updated:Friday 24 May 2019 7:47 pmLegal QA: Why Conor McGregor, Reebok and a Dutch fashion house clashed over a trademarkBy: Claire Lehr and Laura FosterShareFacebookShare on FacebookXShare on TwitterLinkedInShare on LinkedInWhatsAppShare on WhatsAppEmailShare on EmailTwo trademark experts examine the recent dispute involving MMAsuperstar Conor McGregor, sportswear brand Reebok and a Dutch fashion house.What has happenedwith Reebok andConor McGregor A Dutch fashion house called McGregor owns a registered EU trademark for lsquo;McGREGO hydrojug sale Rrsquo; which gives it the right to prevent others from using the mark on clothing throughout the European Union.Adidas subsidiary Reebok, which has a deal with the Irish fighter, used lsquo;CONOR McGREGORrsquo; on sports clothing in such a way that it incurred the wrath of the Dutch company, which asked it to stop.What did Reebokdo wrong Reebok started well: it had a deal with McGregor that his full name ndash; CONOR McGREGOR ndash; could be used on sports clothing.The clothing does feature lsquo;CONOR McGREGORrsquo;, but the p hydrojug cup roblem was that lsquo;McGREGORrsquo; was very, very much larger than lsquo;CONORrsquo;.This led the Dutch company to claim that the trademark lsquo;McGREGORrsquo; was being infringed, that the public would believe that the clothing made by Reebok came from the fashion house McG stanley kubek termiczny regor.Reebok was asked to stop. It did not.What was theoutcome of the case The District Court in
|
|
![[NEW]](./image/new_icon.gif){kind=icon}
- 25/11/9(日) 10:07 -
