Ｐａｇｅ 2968025 ━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━ 通常モードに戻る ┃ ＩＮＤＥＸ ┃ ≪前へ │ 次へ≫ ━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━ ▼It's called Displat MichealLauct 19/6/6(木) 3:55 ─────────────────────────────────────── ■題名 ： It's called Displat ■名前 ： MichealLauct <olgordon89@gmail.com> ■日付 ： 19/6/6(木) 3:55 -------------------------------------------------------------------------
| Evidently they do if they must feel the need to scan for it every single night. Speaking of this, and slightly off topic, I like how in DOFP Peter Dinklage just happens to be a small person, and at no point does the movie feel forced to add a gaint red arrow pointing to this fact, and it's a movie specifically dealing with progressive issues. In fact, he's the bad guy trying to kill em' all with Nazi death robots. Or, buy rechargeable AAs for drastically cheaper on the Xbox controller, or just have a competent Nintendo controller with a built-in battery that lasts as long as AAs (if not longer.) PC gamers will keep on begging for AAA PS exclusives like always and be slaves of Steam. What do you mean by that statement specifically? First time playing as V, at least he brings something new to the table gameplaywise, it felt different even when I just targeted an enemy and smashed X and Y at the same time while trying to keep V away from the enemies. I agree that doing combos takes some time getting used to and I dislike the heavy usage of the upper triggers. Don't know if I should try to map the buttons differently. more than Horizon , I'd like to see Spiderman and God of War 4 on PC Titanfall 2 was good. EA involved. That is flat out wrong. No 5.25 bays in my case. Also I only got one available place to put the ssd bracket, as the other that is free is filled with cables. It will be free I hope if I ditch one GPU I hope. https://cyberia.plati.market/games/the-elder-scrolls-v-skyrim-dragonborn-dlc/350?lang=en-US see "PS4" launch, also if you actually do some research you can find out what these components cost for the individual, as a large corporation sony would pay significantly less, like the Zen2 CPU for example. AMD revealed their yields and it only costs them like $40 to make an 8c Chip, so you could assume sony and AMD have a very good working relationship it wouldnt be hard to think that they would be paying $60 for the cpu. same with the ram, if its GDDR6 regular consumer pricing is something like $9/GB, its not a hard stretch to think that sony is probably paying like $5/GB. the OS is free as it is developed in house and a 250W Psu probably costs like $30 considering you can get a 500W for $40.So No Link.Guess there is still a chance of a $500 - $600 Power House PS5 being released instead of a PS4 Pro-er.tell you what, the PS4 and PS4 pro were both launched at $399, the PS4 pro is a pretty significant upgrade over the PS4 but sony still chose to sell them at $399, there is absolutely no reason to think that sony would sell a PS5 at anymore than $399. its very clear that 399 is sonys price and again with the price of hardware and the fact that console manufacturers always take a loss on their products for the first year or two its not even a hard stretch to think the PS5 will be $399. still a better deal than building a whole new gaming PC.,So why not market a $300 console I mean according to you cheaper is better right?People expect Next Gen to be a jump from last Gen and you are not getting that in a $400 box which will be a slightly better XB1X.At $400 you are probably looking at 8 or 9 TF console with a Zen CPU and 16 Gigs of Ram and that could be with Sony taking a loss on each unit.It makes much more sense to aim for $600. Give us 24 Gigs of Ram, 12-16 TF's with a Zen CPU, SSD and not take a loss on each sale.its going to be $399, its going to have either 12 or 16GB of ram, zen2, Navi is supposed to be the mid end cheapo GPU from AMD and if you havnt followed the news Navi was re designed to work better with consoles. i expect that at most Navi will be no more than 20% faster than the PS4 pro however the big leaps will be in the CPU and if devs can do some "magic" like naughty dog did with the PS3 they could offload some GPU workloads to the CPU.Would you please provide a Link to Sony's official $400 price announcement.see "PS4" launch, also if you actually do some research you can find out what these components cost for the individual, as a large corporation sony would pay significantly less, like the Zen2 CPU for example. AMD revealed their yields and it only costs them like $40 to make an 8c Chip, so you could assume sony and AMD have a very good working relationship it wouldnt be hard to think that they would be paying $60 for the cpu. same with the ram, if its GDDR6 regular consumer pricing is something like $9/GB, its not a hard stretch to think that sony is probably paying like $5/GB. the OS is free as it is developed in house and a 250W Psu probably costs like $30 considering you can get a 500W for $40. ,So why not market a $300 console I mean according to you cheaper is better right?People expect Next Gen to be a jump from last Gen and you are not getting that in a $400 box which will be a slightly better XB1X.At $400 you are probably looking at 8 or 9 TF console with a Zen CPU and 16 Gigs of Ram and that could be with Sony taking a loss on each unit.It makes much more sense to aim for $600. Give us 24 Gigs of Ram, 12-16 TF's with a Zen CPU, SSD and not take a loss on each sale.its going to be $399, its going to have either 12 or 16GB of ram, zen2, Navi is supposed to be the mid end cheapo GPU from AMD and if you havnt followed the news Navi was re designed to work better with consoles. i expect that at most Navi will be no more than 20% faster than the PS4 pro however the big leaps will be in the CPU and if devs can do some "magic" like naughty dog did with the PS3 they could offload some GPU workloads to the CPU.,something i just thught about, this argument is fucking stupid, who gives 2 shits if the PS4 (base) supports HDR or not? it only plays games up to 1920x1080, and to use HDR you need a 4K TV anyways. this thread is about the PS5 not about some stupid shit feature nobody is using.,The article again agreed with what I said, it has the bandwidth but what about the hardware to pass 10bit? HDMI 1.4 only supports 8 bit, and it further agrees with me that there's no content on original PS4 in HDR to verify. Further proving my point. Sony lied to the teeth while Xbone S has HDR games.No body claimed that it's impossible to do HDR with 1080p the question was and still is how do you process 10 bits on a 8 bit hardware without compression or simulation.I connected an old Sony Bravia HDTV 46 inch 1080p to HDMI 1.4 Radeon HD R9-290X and it registered 12 bits color display according to AMD's control panel. LOLI can select 8, 10 and 12bits color within AMD's control panel.The old Sony Bravia HDTV is missing the specific HDR10 color profile.DisplayPort not used.------------I plan to connect HDMI 1.4 Radeon HD R9-290X to HDMI 2.0a FreeSync +HDR +4K LG 32inch monitor.HDMI 2.0a FreeSync +HDR +4K LG 32 inch monitor has been verified to work with my laptop's HDMI 2.0a with HDR10, FreeSync and 4K.You're again talking about Display and GPUs. I never claimed anything related to display or the GPU power. The point is where is the proof that HDMI 1.4 can pass 10 bit info to the display without compression/simulation or dithering. And most specifically where's the evidence to verify Sony's HDR claims as there's no content. I won't respond again if you keep talking about PC GPUs and TVs.PS4 follows Hawaii GCN (R9-290X) limits on HDMI 1.4.Dithering is at flat panel level NOT at Hawaii GCN's HDMI 1.4 port.if you simply go to wikipedia you can see that the HDMI 1.4 spec supports up to 16 bit panels so anyone saying that HDMI 1.4 CANT do 10-bit is dumber than hell i tell ye what!,NVIDIA copied PowerVR's BHV search hardware.http://cdn.imgtec.com/sdk-presentations/gdc2014_introductionToPowerVRRayTracing.pdfPowerVR's ray-tracing tech is based on BVH search engine accelerator similar NVIDIA's RT cores.NVIDIA's argumentyou know you replied to a joke post right?,TV that supports HDR10. My question is how do you transmit 10 bit color from an HDMI chip that only supports 8 bit? PS4 has HDMI 1.4a not 1.4b or HDMI 2.0 or Display Port. Funny thing is the same question is posted on PS4 Reddit yet there's no answer.HDMI 1.4b was released on October 11, 2011. Hawaii GCN can generate digital data for HDMI 2.0 HDR10 at HDMI 1.4 bit rate.Do you do realize that 4:2:0 can be 10bit or 8bit right?My 32 inch LG monitor has FreeSync + HDR10 + HDMI 2.0a and DisplayPort. I can connect my old 4770K + MSI R9-290X Gaming X (similar vintage to PS4) to it.I do realize 4:2:0 can be 8 bit and 10 it however 4:2:0 is compressed and not representative of the true color space.Lastly, I never questioned the GPU is incapable of HDR, I specifically said that PS4 didn't have HDMI 2.0 to pass 10bit HDR. Unless you can prove that HDMI 1.4 can do HDR all of that is irrelevant. I need evidence that HDMI 1.4 can do HDR not GPU, not PS4 hardware not monitors or TVs. Simple.Here's your ownage:ow did Sony do HDR without the hardware for it? You can't change the hardware but just updating the firmware. Sony is faking HDR on original PS4.Red herring with 4K. PS4 is requesting 1080p bit rate with HDR10 NOT 4K HDR10Arguing weather an old console that is about to be obsolete supports a certain function, fantastic. PC/Mac/Linux Society explanation please Look at this little cow alt projecting only what a cow alt can, cow shit. Not disagreeing with you on the ACA negotiations. That's about as bad as it gets when it comes to trying to scuttle an important issue for partisan means. |